Modeling Methods in Craniofacial Virtual Surgical Planning

• Published in: The Journal of craniofacial surgery Vol. 34; no. 4; p. 1191
• Main Authors: Riordan, Edward, Yung, Amanda, Cheng, Kai, Lim, Lydia, Clark, Jonathan, Rtshiladze, Michael, Ch'ng, Sydney
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.06.2023
• ISSN: 1536-3732
• DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009187

Despite the widespread use of virtual surgical planning (VSP), few papers describe the modeling methods used to generate the digital simulations that underpin VSP. This paper aims to review the modeling methods that are currently available for use in VSP and the implications of their use in clinical practice. A literature review was undertaken of the two broad categories of modeling techniques; contour-based planning-namely mirroring from the contralateral side, templating from a normative database, and extrapolation from surrounding landmarks-and occlusal-based planning (OBP). The indications for each modeling method were discussed, including mandibular/maxillary reconstruction, pediatric craniofacial surgery, and orthognathic, as well as the limitations to the accuracy of modeling types. Unilateral defects of the upper/midface, wherein contour accuracy is paramount, are best reconstructed using mirroring methods, whereas bilateral defects-or cases with asymmetry due to craniofacial dysmorphology-are most suited to normative-data-based methods. Cases involving resection of the alveolar margin, in which functional occlusion is the primary outcome are best managed with OBP. Similarly, orthognathic surgery typically uses OBP, although complex cases involving asymmetry, such as clefts, may benefit from a combination of OBP and normative data methods. The choice of modeling methods is, therefore, largely driven by the defect type and the goals of reconstruction.