Identifying critical quality metrics in Mohs Surgery: A national expert consensus process

• Published in: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology Vol. 90; no. 4; pp. 798 - 805
• Main Authors: Dodson, Joseph A., Ibrahim, Sarah A., Rogers, Howard, Council, M. Laurin, Nehal, Kishwer S., Tung, Rebecca, Leffell, David J., Zeitouni, Nathalie C., Totonchy, Mariam B., Fosko, Scott W., Lee Soon, Seaver, Blalock, Travis W., Brodland, David G., Billingsley, Elizabeth M., Scott, Jeffrey F., Leach, Brian C., Ratner, Desiree, Washington, Carl, Hanke, C. William, Otley, Clark C., Golda, Nicholas, Nijhawan, Rajiv I., Brewer, Jerry, Demer, Addison, Fish, Frederick, Harmon, Christopher B., Zitelli, John, Knackstedt, Thomas, Singh, Gaurav, Mollet, Todd, Carr, David R., Albertini, John G., Moody, Brent R., McDonald, Michel, Bordeaux, Jeremy S., Massey, Paul R., MacCormack, Mollie A., Vidimos, Allison, Arpey, Christopher J., Arron, Sarah T., Ibrahimi, Omar A., Jiang, S. Brian, Miller, Christopher J., Maher, Ian A., Wysong, Ashley, Leshin, Barry, Goldman, Glenn D., Kibbi, Nour, Feng, Hao, Collins, Lindsey
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.04.2024
• Subjects: ACMS; American College of Mohs Surgery; Benchmarking; Consensus; Humans; Mohs Surgery; quality metrics; Skin Neoplasms - surgery; Surgeons; value-based healthcare; MMS; value-based healthcare; ACMS; American College of Mohs Surgery; quality metrics; NMSC; Mohs surgery
• ISSN: 0190-9622; 1097-6787; 1097-6787
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.10.069

Amid a movement toward value-based healthcare, increasing emphasis has been placed on outcomes and cost of medical services. To define and demonstrate the quality of services provided by Mohs surgeons, it is important to identify and understand the key aspects of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) that contribute to excellence in patient care. The purpose of this study is to develop and identify a comprehensive list of metrics in an initial effort to define excellence in MMS. Mohs surgeons participated in a modified Delphi process to reach a consensus on a list of metrics. Patients were administered surveys to gather patient perspectives. Twenty-four of the original 66 metrics met final inclusion criteria. Broad support for the initiative was obtained through physician feedback. Limitations of this study include attrition bias across survey rounds and participation at the consensus meeting. Furthermore, the list of metrics is based on expert consensus instead of quality evidence-based outcomes. With the goal of identifying metrics that demonstrate excellence in performance of MMS, this initial effort has shown that Mohs surgeons and patients have unique perspectives and can be engaged in a data-driven approach to help define excellence in the field of MMS.