Resilience against intentional shocks: a wargaming study of the relation between space, action and the residing population to resilience
The most widely established consensus on regional resilience is that there is no consensus on definition, application and theoretical boundaries. Despite most authors expressing objections to “stretching” the concept of resilience too far to be meaningful and its applications too varying to establis...
Saved in:
Published in | Eastern journal of European studies Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 5 - 26 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Iasi
Editura Universităţii »Alexandru Ioan Cuza« din Iaşi
01.06.2020
The Publishing House of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi - CES - EJES Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The most widely established consensus on regional resilience is that there is no consensus on definition, application and theoretical boundaries. Despite most authors expressing objections to “stretching” the concept of resilience too far to be meaningful and its applications too varying to establish a practical framework, this study offers a participatory study of the applied concept with both conclusions about the framework and results of its implementation. The design of the study took into account the substantiated claims of previous use of resilience as a patch to all community problems and adding a new name instead of a new way of addressing them. The study introduces wargaming with the policy-makers of NATO as a reflection and mapping tool to recognize the deficiencies of the framework. The results have verified the main criticism of the concept and offered recommendations on continuing the revision of the resilience framework based on practical insights from policy-makers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2068-651X 2068-6633 |