The Effect of Aerobic Training and Increasing Nonexercise Physical Activity on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors

• Published in: Medicine and science in sports and exercise Vol. 53; no. 10; p. 2152
• Main Authors: Swift, Damon L, Nevels, Tyara R, Solar, Chelsey A, Brophy, Patricia M, McGee, Joshua E, Brewer, Savanna B, Clark, Angela, Houmard, Joseph A, Lutes, Lesley D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.10.2021
• Subjects: Blood Glucose - metabolism; Body Fat Distribution; Cardiometabolic Risk Factors; Exercise - physiology; Exercise Therapy - methods; Female; Fitness Trackers; Humans; Insulin - blood; Lipids - blood; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity - blood; Obesity - therapy; Physical Conditioning, Human; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Sedentary Behavior; Waist Circumference; Weight Loss
• ISSN: 1530-0315
• DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002675

Epidemiological studies suggest that sedentary behavior is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular mortality independent of meeting physical activity guidelines. However, limited evidence of this relationship is available from prospective interventions. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the combined effect of aerobic training and increasing nonexercise physical activity on body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors. Obese adults (N = 45) were randomized to 6 months of aerobic training (AERO), aerobic training and increasing nonexercise physical activity (~3000 steps above baseline levels; AERO-PA), or a control (CON) group. The AERO and AERO-PA groups performed supervised aerobic training (3-4 times per week). The AERO-PA group wore Fitbit One accelerometers and received behavioral coaching to increase nonexercise physical activity. There was a larger increase in fitness in the AERO-PA group (0.27 L·min-1; confidence interval (CI), 0.16 to 0.40 L·min-1) compared with the AERO group (0.09 L·min-1; CI, -0.04 to 0.22 L·min-1) and the CON group (0.01; CI, -0.11 to 0.12 L·min-1). Although significant findings were not observed in the entire study sample, when the analysis was restricted to participants compliant to the intervention (n = 33), we observed significant reductions in waist circumference, percent weight loss, body fat, 2-h glucose, and 2-h insulin in comparison to the CON group (P < 0.05), but not the AERO group. Furthermore, linear regression models showed that change in steps was associated with 21% and 26% of the variation in percent weight loss and percent fat loss, respectively. Increasing nonexercise physical activity with aerobic training may represent a viable strategy to augment the fitness response in comparison to aerobic training alone and has promise for other health indicators.