Comparison of the Oral Steroids, Macrolides and Combination Therapy in Nasal Polyposis Patients

In this study, our aim was to compare oral steroid therapy with macrolide therapy and with oral steroid + macrolide (combine) therapy in patients with nasal polyposis (NP). All patients were treated with nasal steroid therapy for eight weeks and divided randomly into three groups as follows: Oral st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inŞişli Etfal Hastanesi tıp bülteni Vol. 54; no. 2; pp. 211 - 217
Main Authors Tetik, Fatih, Korkut, Arzu Yasemin, Kaya, Kerem Sami, Ucak, Irmak, Celebi, Irfan, Coskun, Berna Uslu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Turkey Kare Publishing 01.01.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this study, our aim was to compare oral steroid therapy with macrolide therapy and with oral steroid + macrolide (combine) therapy in patients with nasal polyposis (NP). All patients were treated with nasal steroid therapy for eight weeks and divided randomly into three groups as follows: Oral steroid group, oral macrolide group and combine group. All patients underwent endoscopic staging, radiological grading, odour testing and completed the sino-nasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22) questionnaire before and after treatment. Significant improvement was observed in all parameters after treatment in all three groups. All parameters were significantly better in the combined group than in the macrolide group. Comparison of the oral steroid group and macrolide group revealed significantly better radiological grading and odour test changes for the oral steroid group, but no statistically significant differences existed according to endoscopic staging and SNOT-22. The post-treatment SNOT-22 score was significantly better in the combined group than in the steroid group. A comparison of the combined and steroid groups showed better results for the combined group for all parameters, but the differences were not significant. All treatment protocols were effective and the successful use of macrolide indicates its potential as an alternative in patients with contraindications to oral steroid treatment. The combined treatment may demonstrate significantly better results than steroid treatment alone if larger studies with more patients are performed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1302-7123
1308-5123
DOI:10.14744/SEMB.2018.40316