Validating the Reliability and Clinical Relevance of an Infraorbital Hollow Photonumeric Scale

Abstract Background Infraorbital hollowing is a facial aesthetic issue for which a broad age range of patients seek treatment. Expanding treatment options for this region warrants the development of validated tools to objectively assess infraorbital hollow (IOH) severity before and after treatment....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum Vol. 5; p. ojad052
Main Authors Lorenc, Z Paul, Smith, Stacy, Bass, Lawrence S, Bank, David, Weiss, Robert, Canfield, Doug, D’Alessandro, Brian M, Cramer, Lisa M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published US Oxford University Press 11.01.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Infraorbital hollowing is a facial aesthetic issue for which a broad age range of patients seek treatment. Expanding treatment options for this region warrants the development of validated tools to objectively assess infraorbital hollow (IOH) severity before and after treatment. Objectives To validate a 4-point rating scale to assess depression of IOH, depression relative to the mid-pupillary line, and visibility of the lateral orbital rim. Methods The IOH scale described herein was developed and subjected to live validation with a total of 73 patients representing the full range of IOH severities. Scale validation was performed by board-certified plastic surgeons and dermatologists (3 raters) over 2 rounds, 2 weeks apart. Intrarater and interrater reliabilities were used to demonstrate test–retest reliability as quantitated with percentage of agreement, weighted kappa statistic with 95% confidence interval (CI), and intraclass correlation coefficient with 95% CI. The clinical relevance of a 1-grade difference was evaluated by comparing rater assessments of 77 photo pairs with their previously determined designation as “clinically different” or “not clinically different.” Results The IOH scale demonstrated substantial to near-perfect intrarater and interrater reliabilities when utilized by trained raters to assess a diverse group of live patients. Furthermore, clinically relevant differences between grades were established, and detection of a 1-point difference could be achieved by trained evaluators using the IOH scale. Conclusions This highly reliable, clinically relevant, and validated IOH scale provides a user-friendly, standardized grading system to objectively evaluate and track changes in infraorbital hollowing in clinical practice and research. Level of Evidence: 3
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Dr Bank is a dermatologist in private practice in Mt Kisco, NY, USA.
Dr D’Alessandro is principal scientist, Canfield Scientific, Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.
Dr Smith is president, California Dermatology and Clinical Research Institute, Encinitas, CA, USA.
Dr Lorenc is a plastic surgeon in private practice in New York, NY, USA; and a clinical editor for Aesthetic Surgery Journal.
Dr Weiss is an adjunct assistant professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mr Canfield is president, Canfield Scientific, Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.
Ms Cramer is director, Canfield Scientific, Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.
Dr Bass is a clinical assistant professor of plastic surgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA.
ISSN:2631-4797
2631-4797
DOI:10.1093/asjof/ojad052