Comparative absorption, electroabsorption and electrochemical studies of intervalence electron transfer and electronic coupling in cyanide-bridged bimetallic systems: ancillary ligand effects

Electroabsorption or Stark spectroscopy has been used to evaluate the systems (NC) 5M II–CN–Ru III(NH 3) 5 1− and (NC) 5M II–CN–Ru III(NH 3) 4py 1−, where M II=Fe II or Ru II. When a pyridine ligand is present in the axial position on the Ru III acceptor, the effective optical electron transfer dist...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChemical physics Vol. 253; no. 2; pp. 313 - 322
Main Authors Vance, Fredrick W., Slone, Robert V., Stern, Charlotte L., Hupp, Joseph T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.03.2000
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Electroabsorption or Stark spectroscopy has been used to evaluate the systems (NC) 5M II–CN–Ru III(NH 3) 5 1− and (NC) 5M II–CN–Ru III(NH 3) 4py 1−, where M II=Fe II or Ru II. When a pyridine ligand is present in the axial position on the Ru III acceptor, the effective optical electron transfer distance – as measured by the change in dipole moment, |Δ μ| – is increased by more than 35% relative to the ammine substituted counterpart. Comparison of the charge transfer distances to the crystal structure of Na[(CN) 5Fe–CN–Ru(NH 3) 4py] · 6H 2O reveals that the Stark derived distances are ∼50% to ∼90% of the geometric separation of the metal centers. The differences result in an upward revision in the Hush delocalization parameter, c b 2 , and of the electronic coupling matrix element, H ab , relative to those parameters obtained exclusively from electronic absorption measurements. The revised parameters are compared to those, which are obtained via electrochemical techniques and found to be in only fair agreement. We conclude that the absorption/electroabsorption analysis likely yields a more reliable set of mixing and coupling parameters.
ISSN:0301-0104
DOI:10.1016/S0301-0104(99)00400-0