Does an Uninstrumented Level Increase the Rate of Revision Surgery in a Multilevel Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion?

This was a retrospective cohort study. The goal of this study is to determine if skipping a single level affects the revision rate for patients undergoing multilevel posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF). A multilevel PCDF is a common procedure for patients with cervical spondylotic mye...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical spine surgery Vol. 32; no. 10; p. E416
Main Authors Schroeder, Gregory D, McKenzie, James C, Casper, David S, Mangan, John J, Stull, Justin, Kepler, Christopher K, Nicholson, Kristen J, Kurd, Mark F, Hilibrand, Alan S, Murphy, Hamadi, Woods, Barrett I, Radcliff, Kris E, Anderson, David G, Vaccaro, Alexander R, Rihn, Jeffery A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.12.2019
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This was a retrospective cohort study. The goal of this study is to determine if skipping a single level affects the revision rate for patients undergoing multilevel posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF). A multilevel PCDF is a common procedure for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. With advanced pathology, it can be difficult to safely place screw instrumentation at every level increasing the risk of intraoperative and perioperative morbidity. It is unclear whether skipping a level during PCDF affects fusion and revision rates. A cervical spine surgeries database at a single institution was used to identify patients who underwent ≥3 levels of PCDF. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients who had screws placed at every level or if they had a single level without screws bilaterally. Patients were excluded if the surgery was performed for tumor, trauma, or infection, and age below 18 years, or if there was <1 year of follow-up. A total of 157 patients met inclusion criteria, with 86 undergoing a PCDF with instrumentation at all levels and 71 that had a single uninstrumented level. Overall mean follow-up was 46.5±22.8 months. In patients with or without a skipped level, the revision rate was 25% and 26%, respectively (P<1.00). Univariate regression analysis demonstrated that proximal fixation level in the upper cervical region, having the fusion end at C7, prior surgery, and myelopathy were significant predictors of revision. Skipping a single level, however, was not predictive of revision. When performing a multilevel PCDF, there is no increase in the rate of revision surgery if a single level is uninstrumented. Conversely, other surgical factors, including the cranial and caudal levels, affect revision rates. In contrast to other reports, the C2 sagittal vertical axis did not affect reoperation rates. Level IV.
ISSN:2380-0194
DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000910