Effect of different postures of the scapular girdle and arm on the pressure pain threshold in the infraspinatus muscle

• Published in: Journal of bodywork and movement therapies Vol. 28; pp. 276 - 282
• Main Authors: Intelangelo, Leonardo, Bordachar, Diego J., Mendoza, Cristian I., Imaz, Fernando, Barone, Mauro, Barbosa, Alexandre W.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2021
• Subjects: Adult; Arm; Humans; Infraspinatus muscle; Pain Threshold; Posture; Pressure pain threshold; Rotator Cuff; Scapula; Scapular girdle; Shoulder Pain; Young Adult; Pressure pain threshold; Infraspinatus muscle; Shoulder pain; Scapular girdle; Posture
• ISSN: 1360-8592; 1532-9283
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.08.001

Mechanosensitivity changes and trigger points in the infraspinatus muscle are associated with several painful conditions of the upper limb. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different postures of the upper quadrant on the pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the infraspinatus muscle. This was an observational, cross-sectional study. Fifty-four subjects with and without shoulder pain (Asymptomatic subjects = 27, mean age 26.9 ± 4.92 years, BMI 23.73 ± 3.87), (symptomatic subjects = 27, mean age 27.6 ± 3.68 years, BMI 24.35 ± 3.86) were evaluated with a pressure algometer on the infraspinatus muscle belly, in four different positions of the upper quadrant: rest position (P1), passive scapular retraction position (P2), cervical contralateral inclination position (P3), and suprascapular nerve provocation position (P4). The assessed side was randomly chosen and all measurements were taken in sitting position. No differences were observed between groups. The within-group analysis showed differences for both factors: “Positions” (F = 69.91; p = 0.001) and the interaction “Positions^Group” (F = 3.36; p = 0.02). The pairwise post-hoc analysis showed differences for the retracted position (P2) compared to others P1 (p = 0.001), P3 (p = 0.001), and P4 (p = 0.001), with higher PPT results achieved on the retracted position. Differences between P4 vs. P1 (p = 0.03) were also observed, with higher values for P4. Placing the scapular girdle in a passive scapular retraction position significantly reduces the pressure sensitivity at the infraspinatus muscle. Physiotherapists can take into account these results when assessing and treating patients with upper quadrant pain syndromes.