Preoperative Joint Distraction Imaging and Planning Protocol for Total Knee Arthroplasty

• Published in: The Journal of arthroplasty Vol. 39; no. 5; pp. 1259 - 1265
• Main Authors: Jagota, Ishaan, Twiggs, Joshua, Miles, Brad, Liu, David
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2024
• Subjects: Adult; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods; coronal knee laxity; distracted alignment; functional alignment; Humans; joint distraction; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging; Knee Joint - surgery; Lower Extremity - surgery; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery; preoperative planning; Retrospective Studies; Tibia - diagnostic imaging; Tibia - surgery; total knee arthroplasty; distracted alignment; total knee arthroplasty; joint distraction; coronal knee laxity; preoperative planning; functional alignment
• ISSN: 0883-5403; 1532-8406
• DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.11.025

Current preoperative total knee arthroplasty (TKA) planning strategies are bone-referencing and do not consider the ligamentous profile of the knee. This study assessed the mean Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle of the planned Distracted Alignment (DA), an alignment output using a joint distraction radiology and planning protocol, which incorporates preoperative evaluation of ligament laxity. A retrospective study of 144 knees undergoing TKA was performed. Each patient received a preoperative computer tomograph scan, a weight-bearing antero-posterior knee radiograph, and distracted knee radiographs in extension and flexion. The imaging was used to develop a preoperative DA plan aiming for medio-lateral and extension-flexion space balance. The mean DA, weight-bearing, and arithmetic HKA angles were compared to each other, and to the HKA of a healthy nonarthritic population. The mean weight-bearing, arithmetic, and planned DA HKA angles were 4.8° (interquartile range [IQR] 6.5°) varus, 0.4° (IQR 4.5°) varus, and 2.2° (IQR 4.0°) varus, respectively. This compares to a healthy adult HKA angle of 1.3° varus. The difference between the planned DA and arithmetic HKA angles was greater than 3° for 36% of the patients in the study population. The planned DA HKA angle was fundamentally different from the arithmetic HKA angle, but comparable to a healthy population. Considering both hard and soft tissue information of the knee, we believe the planned DA resulting from the joint distraction radiology protocol allows for optimized preoperative surgical planning in TKA. This protocol has been shown to be clinically viable.