Association of previous stillbirth with subsequent perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

• Published in: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology Vol. 231; no. 2; pp. 211 - 222
• Main Authors: Deng, Xiyuan, Pan, Bei, Lai, Honghao, Sun, Qingmei, Lin, Xiaojuan, Yang, Jinwei, Han, Xin, Ge, Tingting, Li, Qiuyuan, Ge, Long, Liu, Xiaowei, Ma, Ning, Wang, Xiaoman, Li, Dan, Yang, Yongxiu, Yang, Kehu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2024
• Subjects: Abruptio Placentae - epidemiology; adverse pregnancy outcomes; Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data; Cohort Studies; Female; fetal death; Fetal Growth Retardation - epidemiology; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Small for Gestational Age; perinatal outcomes; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology; Premature Birth - epidemiology; Recurrence; risk; stillbirth; Stillbirth - epidemiology; subsequent pregnancies; stillbirth; subsequent pregnancies; risk; perinatal outcomes; adverse pregnancy outcomes; fetal death
• ISSN: 0002-9378; 1097-6868; 1097-6868
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.304

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the relationship between stillbirth and various perinatal outcomes in subsequent pregnancy. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and CNKI databases were searched up to July 2023. Cohort studies that reported the association between stillbirth and perinatal outcomes in subsequent pregnancies were included. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using R and Stata software. We used random-effects models to pool each outcome of interest. We performed a meta-regression analysis to explore the potential heterogeneity. The certainty (quality) of evidence assessment was performed using the GRADE approach. Nineteen cohort studies were included, involving 4,855,153 participants. From these studies, we identified 28,322 individuals with previous stillbirths who met the eligibility criteria. After adjusting for confounders, evidence of low to moderate certainty indicated that compared with women with previous live births, women with previous stillbirths had higher risks of recurrent stillbirth (odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 2.01–3.56), preterm birth (odds ratio, 3.15; 95% confidence interval, 2.07–4.80), neonatal death (odds ratio, 4.24; 95% confidence interval, 2.65–6.79), small for gestational age/intrauterine growth restriction (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0–1.8), low birthweight (odds ratio, 3.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.46–7.52), placental abruption (odds ratio, 3.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–8.98), instrumental delivery (odds ratio, 2.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.68–3.11), labor induction (odds ratio, 4.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–8.88), cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 2.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.20–4.73), elective cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 2.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.82–3.23), and emergency cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.81–3.06) in subsequent pregnancies, but had a lower rate of spontaneous labor (odds ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.13–0.36). However, there was no association between previous stillbirth and preeclampsia (odds ratio, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.63–4.70) in subsequent pregnancies. Our systematic review and meta-analysis provide a more comprehensive understanding of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with previous stillbirth. These findings could be used to inform counseling for couples who are considering pregnancy after a previous stillbirth. [Display omitted]