General sparse risk parity portfolio design via successive convex optimization

•We conducted new simulations on S&P 500. From this new simulation, we can see that the portfolio behaves as we expected as it achieves a good tradeoff among different metrics of interest. However, since the initial set of assets changes and we have no preporcessing on the large scale data, the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSignal processing Vol. 170; p. 107433
Main Authors Wu, Linlong, Feng, Yiyong, Palomar, Daniel P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.05.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•We conducted new simulations on S&P 500. From this new simulation, we can see that the portfolio behaves as we expected as it achieves a good tradeoff among different metrics of interest. However, since the initial set of assets changes and we have no preporcessing on the large scale data, the performance will deteriorate to some degree as we expect.•We explained some technical points in terms of the proposed algorithm, especially in terms of the efficiency.•We revised some illustrations of the focus of this paper to make our point more clear. This paper proposed a sparse risk parity portfolio and the corresponding fast solving numerical algorithm. The algorithm can design the portfolio weights well with the support of read data simulation. Since the 2008 financial crisis, risk management has become more important and portfolio approaches, such as the minimum-variance and equally weighted portfolios, have gained popularity. However, such portfolios still do not diversify the risk in the true sense. Recently, risk parity portfolios has been receiving significant interest from both the theoretical and practical perspectives due to its advantages in the diversification of (ex-ante) risk contributions among assets. However, this portfolio type usually results in nonzero weights in all the assets, which implies high transaction cost in practice. In addition, focusing only on the risk aspect can make this type of portfolio unsatisfactory if other performance factors, e.g., annual yield, are considered. In this paper, we jointly consider asset selection and risk diversification via imposing sparsity and risk parity regularization in the portfolio problem formulation, which turns out to be a general and flexible portfolio framework. Then we propose an efficient sequential algorithm based on the successive convex optimization framework. The numerical results on historical data show that our portfolio approach, compared with benchmark portfolios, can achieve a good balance among asset selection, risk diversification and other evaluation criteria, and achieves the best performance on profit and loss (P&L) and/or drawdown.
ISSN:0165-1684
1872-7557
DOI:10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.107433