Bat activity response to fire regime depends on species, vegetation conditions, and behavior

• Published in: Forest ecology and management Vol. 502; p. 119722
• Main Authors: Taillie, P.J., Braun de Torrez, E.C., Potash, A.D., Boone IV, W.W., Jones, M., Wallrichs, M.A., Schellenberg, F., Hooker, K., Ober, H.K., McCleery, R.A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 15.12.2021
• Subjects: Acoustic detection; Bat community; Florida; Pine forest; Pine forest; Florida; Bat community; Acoustic detection
• ISSN: 0378-1127; 1872-7042
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119722

•Vegetation conditions were more strongly related to bat activity than fire regime.•Bat community activity increased with fire frequency.•Bat response to fire frequency varied across species.•Foraging efficiency and emergence activity decreased with fire frequency. Disturbances such as fire play an important role in shaping forests and the wildlife they support. As such, forest managers employ prescribed fire to restore ecosystem function, promote forest biodiversity, and maintain wildlife habitat. To better understand how bats respond to variation in fire regime, we used acoustic recorders to quantify bat activity in forests maintained by frequent fire in southern Florida, USA and modelled this variation as a function of both fire regime and vegetation characteristics. Next, to better understand the mechanisms underlying these responses, we quantified variation in bat foraging efficiency and activity during the important early evening period. We found that even in regions historically maintained by frequent fire, bat activity was more closely associated with vegetation conditions, such as canopy cover and woody understory volume, than fire regime. When vegetation and fire frequency were considered together, the bat activity response was nuanced. Activity across the bat community was greater in forests that had burned more frequently in the previous two decades, but bats appeared more likely to encounter prey in forests that burned less frequently. Species-specific responses added additional complexity, potentially related to size and wing morphology, with larger bats responding more strongly to fire, whereas activity of smaller bats was primarily related to vegetation characteristics. Similarly, activity during the early-evening shifted as a function of fire frequency, but in different directions for different species. Our results suggest that investigations of occurrence or overall bat activity may provide an incomplete understanding of the complex responses to fire regimes that become more apparent when activity is partitioned into more refined metrics. These nuances have implications for management of fire-maintained forests. Though frequent burning may best promote the ecosystem services associated with insectivorous bat activity, a more heterogenous approach to fire management that considers bat species diversity, bat behavior, and vegetation conditions may provide additional benefits to bats.