Photoelastic stress analysis of different attachment systems on implant-retained and conventional palatal obturator prostheses

• Published in: The Journal of craniofacial surgery Vol. 22; no. 2; p. 523
• Main Authors: do Prado Ribeiro, Paula, Goiato, Marcelo Coelho, Pellizzer, Eduardo Pizza, Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves, Haddad, Marcela Filiè, Alves-Rezende, Maria Cristina Rosifini, dos Santos, Daniela Micheline
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.03.2011
• Subjects: Dental Models; Dental Prosthesis Design; Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Dental Stress Analysis - methods; Humans; Palatal Obturators; Titanium; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 1536-3732
• DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182085401

Considering that an increasing number of patients are victims of mutilator surgical resections, these studies are important for treatment success of rehabilitation of patients presenting oronasal communication. The aim of this study was to assess the stress distribution through photoelasticity in palatal obturator prostheses with different attachment systems for implants. Two photoelastic models were obtained from an experimental maxillary model presenting an oronasal communication. One model was fabricated without implant, and the other with 2 implants 10 mm in length inserted in the left crest. Four colorless palatal obturator prostheses were fabricated. One prosthesis presented no attachment system, whereas the remaining prostheses were adapted to 3 attachment systems. The assembly was positioned in a circular polariscope for application of axial load. The results were based on photographic records of stress in the photoelastic model submitted to loading. The records revealed higher stress concentration on the bar-clip system followed by the O'ring/bar-clip and O'ring systems, respectively. A homogeneous stress distribution was observed on the photoelastic model with the mucous-supported prosthesis. The attachment systems generated different characteristics of stress distribution that was concentrated surrounding the implants. The bar-clip system exhibited the highest stress concentration on the alveolar crest.