Evaluation of mechanical soft-abrasive blasting and chemical cleaning methods on alkyd-paint graffiti made on calcareous stones

• Published in: Journal of cultural heritage Vol. 16; no. 4; pp. 579 - 590
• Main Authors: Carvalhão, Miguel, Dionísio, Amélia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Masson SAS 01.07.2015
• Subjects: Alkyd spray paints; Carbonate stones; Chemical cleaning; Effectiveness; Graffiti; Harmfulness; Mechanical soft-abrasive cleaning; Nocivity; Mechanical soft-abrasive cleaning; Nocivity; Alkyd spray paints; Effectiveness; Graffiti; Chemical cleaning; Harmfulness; Carbonate stones
• ISSN: 1296-2074; 1778-3674
• DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2014.10.004

This study focuses on the assessment of three graffiti cleaning systems on alkyd-paint graffiti aerosols made on two Portuguese calcareous stones, a marble, Branco, and a limestone, Lioz. These calcareous stones are commonly used in Portugal as building materials and ornamental stones. Two non-conventional commercial dry soft-abrasive blasting media (MC1 and MC2), specifically developed to clean the sensitive and delicate surfaces were tested: MC1 uses a sponge-like urethane polymer involving spherical calcium carbonate particles and in MC2 pure spherical calcium carbonate particles are used. An alkaline cleaner based on a solution of potassium hydroxide was also tested. The criteria for assessing the effectiveness and potential risks included changes in the chromatic parameters, static contact angle and surface roughness of the stones, identification of deleterious products and modification of the morphology and the composition of the surfaces. The methods were effective in the removal of the paint layers, although surfaces became slightly lighter. Adapting the classification proposed by Garcia and Malaga, 2012, the mechanical soft-abrasive cleaning methods were classified for both stones as Class C, i.e., with ΔEab near 12. The chemical cleaning was classified as Class A for the marble (ΔEab<5) and as Class B for the limestone (5<ΔEab<10). No subproducts were identified. With the chemical cleaning, distinct removal of crystals or dissolution of grain boundaries in addition to surface dissolution was observed. The cleaning methods presented a slight low damage potential to these stone materials, i.e., the impact of the cleaning methods on the topography of the surfaces was much reduced. These methods also altered the water repellence of the stone surfaces. An increase in the static contact angles was observed and could be related with changes in the roughness of the surfaces and also to unremoved polymers absorbed in some of the pores of the surfaces.