Why does social essentialism sometimes promote, and other times mitigate, prejudice development? A causal discounting perspective

•Social essentialism promotes early prejudices based on race, ethnicity, and gender.•It also mitigates early prejudices based on sexual orientation, weight, and illness.•Causal discounting may partly account for these divergent effects of essentialism.•Prejudice may reflect both the explanations chi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCognitive development Vol. 59; p. 101085
Main Author Peretz-Lange, Rebecca
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.07.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Social essentialism promotes early prejudices based on race, ethnicity, and gender.•It also mitigates early prejudices based on sexual orientation, weight, and illness.•Causal discounting may partly account for these divergent effects of essentialism.•Prejudice may reflect both the explanations children endorse and those they discount.•Looking across diverse forms of prejudice can reveal underlying cognitive processes. Children often hold “essentialist” intuitions about social categories, viewing them as reflecting people’s intrinsic essences or biological natures. This intuition promotes prejudice development (e.g., race- and gender-based prejudices). However, emerging research reveals that essentialism also mitigates prejudice development (e.g., weight- and sexuality-based prejudices). Why do children’s essentialist views sometimes promote prejudice, and other times mitigate it? I propose that causal discounting may account for these distinct effects: Essentialism may promote prejudice by leading children to discount structural explanations (i.e., to reason that a group is low-status because of its personal deficiencies rather than its structural disadvantages), but it may mitigate prejudice by leading children to discount agentic explanations (i.e., to reason that a group was “born that way” rather than choosing to be that way). Thus, the consequences of essentialism may reflect both the explanations children endorse as well as those they discount. Cognitive, developmental, and social implications are discussed.
ISSN:0885-2014
1879-226X
DOI:10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101085