Academic myths of tourism

• Published in: Annals of tourism research Vol. 46; pp. 16 - 28
• Main Authors: McKercher, Bob, Prideaux, Bruce
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2014
• Subjects: Discipline; Field of study; Myth; Field of study; Myth; Discipline
• ISSN: 0160-7383; 1873-7722
• DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2014.02.003

•Defines tourism myths as demonstrably false but widely held, long-standing beliefs.•Identifies a wide array of myths.•Classifies them into 6 categories.•Examines their origins.•Discusses the implications on and for tourism scholarship. Myths play a critical role in the development of any field of study. They act as the central point for coalition, and differentiate disciplines from each other. The absolute truthfulness of some myths, therefore is less important than their symbolic truth. Other myths, though, can be damaging, promulgating falsehoods and inhibiting the development of a field. This paper examines the roles myths have played in establishing the cult of tourism scholarship. Senior academics were surveyed to identify what they believe to be myths about tourism. Six broad categories of myth emerged: self interest; foundation; reactive stakeholder; convergent; too good not to be true; and myths inherited from other disciplines. Promulgation of these myths has been abetted by methodological inertia.