Effectiveness of preoxygenation strategies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

• Published in: British journal of anaesthesia : BJA Vol. 133; no. 1; pp. 152 - 163
• Main Authors: Crístian de Carvalho, Clístenes, Iliff, Helen A., Santos Neto, Jayme M., Potter, Thomas, Alves, Max B., Blake, Lindsay, El-Boghdadly, Kariem
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2024
• Subjects: apnoeic oxygenation; facemask; high-flow nasal oxygen; peroxygenation; preoxygenation; thrive; apnoeic oxygenation; thrive; preoxygenation; peroxygenation; high-flow nasal oxygen; facemask
• ISSN: 0007-0912; 1471-6771; 1471-6771
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.02.028

Preoxygenation is universally recommended before induction of general anaesthesia to prolong safe apnoea time. The optimal technique for preoxygenation is unclear. We conducted a systematic review to determine the preoxygenation technique associated with the greatest effectiveness in adult patients having general anaesthesia. We searched six databases for randomised controlled trials of patients aged ≥16 yr, receiving general anaesthesia in any setting and comparing different preoxygenation techniques and methods. Our primary effectiveness outcome was safe apnoea time, and secondary outcomes included incidence of arterial oxygen desaturation; lowest SpO2 during airway management; time to end-tidal oxygen concentration of 90%; and PaCO2 and PaO2 at the end of preoxygenation. We assessed the quality of evidence according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) recommendations. We included 52 studies of 3914 patients. High-flow nasal oxygen with patients in a head-up position was most likely to be associated with a prolonged safe apnoea time when compared with other strategies, with a mean difference (95% credible interval) of 291 (138–456) s and 203 (79–343) s compared with preoxygenation with a facemask in the supine and head-up positions, respectively. Subgroup analysis of studies without apnoeic oxygenation also showed high-flow nasal oxygen in the head-up position as the highest ranked technique, with a statistically significantly delayed mean difference (95% credible interval) safe apnoea time compared with facemask in supine and head-up positions of 222 (63–378) s and 139 (15–262) s, respectively. High-flow nasal oxygen was also the highest ranked technique for increased PaO2 at the end of preoxygenation. However, the incidence of arterial desaturation was less likely to occur when a facemask with pressure support was used compared with other techniques, and PaCO2 was most likely to be lowest when preoxygenation took place with patients deep breathing in a supine position. Preoxygenation of adults before induction of general anaesthesia was most effective in terms of safe apnoea time when performed with high-flow nasal oxygen with patients in the head-up position in comparison with facemask alone. Also, high-flow nasal oxygen in the head-up position is likely to be the most effective technique to prolong safe apnoea time among those evaluated. Clinicians should consider this technique and patient position in routine practice. PROSPERO CRD42022326046.