Timing analysis of the black hole candidate EXO 1846–031 with Insight-HXMT monitoring

We present the observational results from a detailed timing analysis of the black hole candidate EXO 1846–031 during its outburst in 2019 with the observations of Insight -HXMT, NICER and MAXI . This outburst can be classified roughly into four different states. Type-C quasi-periodic oscillations (Q...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inResearch in astronomy and astrophysics Vol. 21; no. 3; pp. 70 - 204
Main Authors Liu, He-Xin, Huang, Yue, Xiao, Guang-Cheng, Bu, Qing-Cui, Qu, Jin-Lu, Zhang, Shu, Zhang, Shuang-Nan, Jia, Shu-Mei, Lu, Fang-Jun, Ma, Xiang, Tao, Lian, Zhang, Wei, Chen, Li, Song, Li-Ming, Li, Ti-Pei, Xu, Yu-Peng, Cao, Xue-Lei, Chen, Yong, Liu, Cong-Zhan, Cai, Ce, Chang, Zhi, Chen, Gang, Chen, Tian-Xiang, Chen, Yi-Bao, Chen, Yu-Peng, Cui, Wei, Cui, Wei-Wei, Deng, Jing-Kang, Dong, Yong-Wei, Du, Yuan-Yuan, Fu, Min-Xue, Gao, Guan-Hua, Gao, He, Gao, Min, Ge, Ming-Yu, Gu, Yu-Dong, Guan, Ju, Guo, Cheng-Cheng, Han, Da-Wei, Huo, Jia, Jiang, Lu-Hua, Jiang, Wei-Chun, Jin, Jing, Jin, Yong-Jie, Kong, Ling-Da, Li, Bing, Li, Cheng-Kui, Li, Gang, Li, Mao-Shun, Li, Wei, Li, Xian, Li, Xiao-Bo, Li, Xu-Fang, Li, Yang-Guo, Li, Zheng-Wei, Liang, Xiao-Hua, Liao, Jing-Yuan, Liu, Bai-Sheng, Liu, Guo-Qing, Liu, Hong-Wei, Liu, Xiao-Jing, Liu, Yi-Nong, Lu, Bo, Lu, Xue-Feng, Luo, Qi, Luo, Tao, Meng, Bin, Nang, Yi, Nie, Jian-Yin, Ou, Ge, Sai, Na, Shang, Ren-Cheng, Song, Xin-Ying, Sun, Liang, Tan, Ying, Tuo, You-Li, Wang, Chen, Wang, Guo-Feng, Wang, Juan, Wang, Ling-Jun, Wang, Weng-Shuai, Wang, Yu-Sa, Wen, Xiang-Yang, Wu, Bai-Yang, Wu, Bo-Bing, Wu, Mei, Xiao, Shuo, Xiong, Shao-Lin, Xu, He, Yang, Jia-Wei, Yang, Sheng, Yang, Yan-Ji, Yang, Yi-Jung, Yi, Qi-Bin, Yin, Qian-Qing, You, Yuan, Zhang, Ai-Mei, Zhang, Cheng-Mo, Zhang, Fan, Zhang, Hong-Mei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Beijing IOP Publishing 01.04.2021
Institut für Astronomic und Astrophysik,Kepler Center for Astro and Particle Physics,Eberhard Karls Universit(a)it,72076 Tübingen,Germany%Key Laboratory of Particle Astrophysics,Institute of High Energy Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China%Key Laboratory of Particle Astrophysics,Institute of High Energy Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
Key Laboratory of Particle Astrophysics,Institute of High Energy Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We present the observational results from a detailed timing analysis of the black hole candidate EXO 1846–031 during its outburst in 2019 with the observations of Insight -HXMT, NICER and MAXI . This outburst can be classified roughly into four different states. Type-C quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) observed by NICER (about 0.1–6 Hz) and Insight -HXMT (about 0.7–8 Hz) are also reported in this work. Meanwhile, we study various physical quantities related to QPO frequency. The QPO rms–frequency relationship in the energy band 1–10 keV indicates that there is a turning pointing in frequency around 2 Hz, which is similar to that of GRS 1915+105. A possible hypothesis for the relationship above may be related to the inclination of the source, which may require a high inclination to explain it. The relationships between QPO frequency and QPO rms, hardness, total fractional rms and count rate have also been found in other transient sources, which can indicate that the origin of type–C QPOs is non-thermal.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1674-4527
DOI:10.1088/1674-4527/21/3/70