Use of consumer ratings for quality improvement in behavioral health insurance plans

• Published in: The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement Vol. 27; no. 4; p. 216
• Main Authors: Shaul, J A, Eisen, S V, Stringfellow, V L, Clarridge, B R, Hermann, R C, Nelson, D, Anderson, E, Kubrin, A I, Leff, H S, Cleary, P D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.04.2001
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Behavioral Medicine - economics; Behavioral Medicine - standards; Female; Health Care Surveys; Humans; Insurance, Psychiatric - standards; Male; Managed Care Programs - economics; Managed Care Programs - standards; Mental Health Services - economics; Mental Health Services - standards; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data; Public Assistance - standards; Total Quality Management; United States; United States
• ISSN: 1070-3241
• DOI: 10.1016/S1070-3241(01)27019-9

The Consumer Assessment of Behavioral Healthcare Services (CABHS) survey collects consumers' reports about their health care plans and treatment. The use of the CABHS to identify opportunities for improvement, with specific attention to how organizations have used the survey information for quality improvement, is described. In 1998 and 1999, data were collected from five groups of adult patients in commercial health plans and five groups of adult patients in public assistance health plans with services received through four organizations (one of three managed behavioral health care organizations or a health system). Patients who received behavioral health care services during the previous year were mailed the CABHS survey. Non-respondents were contacted by telephone to complete the survey. Response rates ranged from 49% to 65% for commercial patient groups and from 36% to 51% for public assistance patients. Promptly getting treatment from clinicians and aspects of care most influenced by health plan policies and operations, such as access to treatment and plan administrative services, received the least positive responses, whereas questions about communication received the most positive responses. In addition, questions about access- and plan-related aspects of quality showed the most interplan variability. Three of the organizations in this study focused quality improvement efforts on access to treatment. Surveys such as the CABHS can identify aspects of the plan and treatment that are improvement priorities. Use of these data is likely to extend beyond the behavioral health plan to consumers, purchasers, regulators, and policymakers, particularly because the National Committee for Quality Assurance is encouraging behavioral health plans to use a similar survey for accreditation purposes.