Primary care transformation in Scotland: qualitative evaluation of the views of patients

• Published in: British journal of general practice Vol. 74; no. 747; pp. e702 - e708
• Main Authors: Donaghy, Eddie, Sweeney, Kieran, Henderson, David, Angus, Colin, Cullen, Morag, Hemphill, Mary, Wang, Harry H X, Guthrie, Bruce, Mercer, Stewart
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Royal College of General Practitioners 01.10.2024
• Subjects: Family physicians; Multidisciplinary teams; Primary care; Quality of care; United Kingdom > UK; Scotland; reform; Primary care transformation; deprivation; multimorbidity; GP contract; patients’ views
• ISSN: 0960-1643; 1478-5242; 1478-5242
• DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0437

The new Scottish GP contract introduced in April 2018 aims to improve quality of care through expansion of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) to enable GPs to spend more time as expert medical generalist with patients with complex needs. To explore patients' views on the changes in general practice in Scotland since the inception of the new contract. Qualitative study with 30 patients (10 living in urban deprived areas, 10 living in urban affluent/mixed urban areas, and 10 living in remote and rural areas). In-depth semi-structured interviews with thematic analysis. Patients were generally unaware of the new GP contract, attributing recent changes in general practice to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ongoing concerns included access to GP consultations (especially face-to-face ones), short consultation length with GPs, and damage to continuity of care and the GP-patient relationship. Most patients spoke positively about consultations with MDT staff but still wanted to see a known GP for health concerns that they considered potentially serious. These issues were especially concerning for patients with multiple complex problems, particularly those from deprived areas. Following the introduction of the new Scottish GP contract, patients in our sample were accepting of first contact care from the MDT but still wanted continuity of care and longer face-to-face consultations with GPs. These findings suggest that the expert generalist role of the GP is not being adequately supported by the new contract, especially in deprived areas, though further quantitative research is required to confirm this.