Effects of experimental context, demand characteristics, and situational cues: new data

• Published in: Perceptual and motor skills Vol. 73; no. 1; p. 83
• Main Authors: Barabasz, M, Barabasz, A, O'Neill, M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.08.1991
• Subjects: Adaptation, Psychological; Adolescent; Adult; Arousal; Attention; Female; Humans; Male; Sensory Deprivation; Social Environment
• ISSN: 0031-5125
• DOI: 10.2466/pms.1991.73.1.83

When in 1964 stress induced by Restricted Environmental Stimulation (REST) was publicized, Orne and Scheibe showed "sensory deprivation" effects could be produced merely by manipulating contextual cues. Since REST is now widely regarded as beneficial, it seemed appropriate to reexamine these early findings. Stringently replicating Orne and Scheibe's procedures, 10 subjects were exposed to conditions designed to generate expected REST effects. Conditions for 10 controls suggested that nothing was expected to happen. Analyses did not confirm earlier findings as no significant difference was found between experimental and control groups on any measure. A postexperimental inquiry identified positive attitudes toward REST. The specific experimental context, demand characteristics, and situational cues did not elicit responses inconsistent with the general sociopsychological context. Researchers are cautioned about attributing causality to contextual cues because context exists merely at a correlative level with data collection.