Efficacy and safety of BRAF/MEK inhibitors in BRAFV600E-mutated anaplastic thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Approximately 45% of anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) patients harbor a BRAF mutation and are eligible for target therapy (TT) with BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi), nevertheless, few data advocate for this. Hence, we've conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEndocrine
Main Authors Priantti, Jonathan N, Rodrigues, Natasha Maranhão Vieira, de Moraes, Francisco Cezar Aquino, da Costa, Allyson Guimarães, Jezini, Deborah Laredo, Heckmann, Maria Izabel Ovellar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 06.05.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Approximately 45% of anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) patients harbor a BRAF mutation and are eligible for target therapy (TT) with BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi), nevertheless, few data advocate for this. Hence, we've conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness and safety of BRAFi/MEKi in BRAF ATC patients. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for BRAFi/MEKi TT in BRAF ATC patients. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR) and adverse events (AEs). Nine studies with 168 patients were included. Median follow-up ranged from 2.0 to 47.9 months. 75% of patients had stage IVc. In a pooled analysis, ORR was 68.15% (95% CI 55.31-80.99, I  = 47%) and DCR was 85.39% (95% CI 78.10-92.68, I  = 0), with a median DOR of 14.4 months (95% CI 4.6-14.4) and a median PFS of 6.7 months (95% CI 4.7-34.2). Moreover, 1-year OS rate was 64.97% (95% CI 48.76-81.17, I  = 84%) and 2-years OS rate was 52.08% (95% CI 35.71-68.45, I  = 79%). Subgroup analysis showed patients in the neoadjuvant setting had higher rates of 1 and 2-years OS and observational studies tended to report higher rates of ORR than clinical trials. No new or unexpected adverse events were found. Our study demonstrated BRAFi/MEKi have a decent activity for BRAF ATC patients, especially in the neoadjuvant setting, with a tolerable safety profile. However, further clinical trials are warranted to investigate these findings.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1559-0100
1559-0100
DOI:10.1007/s12020-024-03845-w