Comparison of Cu3, Cu5, and Cu7 clusters as potential antioxidants: A theoretical quest

Context Herein, we compare and contrast the dual roles of Cu n clusters ( n  = 3, 5, and 7 atoms) in scavenging or generating RO • free radicals from ROH at the theoretical levels (where R = H, methyl, ethyl, n- propyl, i- propyl, n- butyl, t- butyl, and phenyl). This investigation is performed in w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of molecular modeling Vol. 30; no. 5; p. 132
Main Authors Alipour, Batoul, Kassaee, Mohamad Zaman
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.05.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Context Herein, we compare and contrast the dual roles of Cu n clusters ( n  = 3, 5, and 7 atoms) in scavenging or generating RO • free radicals from ROH at the theoretical levels (where R = H, methyl, ethyl, n- propyl, i- propyl, n- butyl, t- butyl, and phenyl). This investigation is performed in water media to mimic the actual environment in the biological system. In the presence of the Cu n clusters, bond dissociation energy (BDE) of RO–H and R–OH is reduced. This is clear evidence for the increased possibility of both the RO–H and R–OH bonds breakage and scavenging of RO • radicals. The nature of anchoring bonds responsible for the interaction of Cu n clusters with ROH and RO • are interpreted using the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) and the natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis. The DFT results indicate that the O • ⋅⋅⋅ • Cu bond is stronger and has more covalent character in RO • ⋅⋅⋅ • Cu n radical complexes than in ROH⋅⋅⋅ • Cu n . Therefore, the interactions of Cu n clusters with RO • radicals (antioxidant) are more pronounced than their interactions with ROH non-radicals (pro-oxidant). Methods The GAMESS software package was utilized in this paper. The B3LYP and M06 functions with the 6–311 +  + G(d,p), and LANL2DZ/SDD basis sets was used to perform the important geometrical parameters of RO • ⋅⋅⋅ • Cu n and ROH⋅⋅⋅ • Cu n , binding energy (E b ), and bond dissociation energy (BDE). Graphical Abstract
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1610-2940
0948-5023
DOI:10.1007/s00894-024-05933-0