Comparison of Cu3, Cu5, and Cu7 clusters as potential antioxidants: A theoretical quest
Context Herein, we compare and contrast the dual roles of Cu n clusters ( n = 3, 5, and 7 atoms) in scavenging or generating RO • free radicals from ROH at the theoretical levels (where R = H, methyl, ethyl, n- propyl, i- propyl, n- butyl, t- butyl, and phenyl). This investigation is performed in w...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of molecular modeling Vol. 30; no. 5; p. 132 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01.05.2024
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Context
Herein, we compare and contrast the dual roles of Cu
n
clusters (
n
= 3, 5, and 7 atoms) in scavenging or generating RO
•
free radicals from ROH at the theoretical levels (where R = H, methyl, ethyl,
n-
propyl,
i-
propyl,
n-
butyl,
t-
butyl, and phenyl). This investigation is performed in water media to mimic the actual environment in the biological system. In the presence of the Cu
n
clusters, bond dissociation energy (BDE) of RO–H and R–OH is reduced. This is clear evidence for the increased possibility of both the RO–H and R–OH bonds breakage and scavenging of RO
•
radicals. The nature of anchoring bonds responsible for the interaction of Cu
n
clusters with ROH and RO
•
are interpreted using the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) and the natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis. The DFT results indicate that the O
•
⋅⋅⋅
•
Cu bond is stronger and has more covalent character in RO
•
⋅⋅⋅
•
Cu
n
radical complexes than in ROH⋅⋅⋅
•
Cu
n
. Therefore, the interactions of Cu
n
clusters with RO
•
radicals (antioxidant) are more pronounced than their interactions with ROH non-radicals (pro-oxidant).
Methods
The GAMESS software package was utilized in this paper. The B3LYP and M06 functions with the 6–311 + + G(d,p), and LANL2DZ/SDD basis sets was used to perform the important geometrical parameters of RO
•
⋅⋅⋅
•
Cu
n
and ROH⋅⋅⋅
•
Cu
n
, binding energy (E
b
), and bond dissociation energy (BDE).
Graphical Abstract |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1610-2940 0948-5023 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00894-024-05933-0 |