Static iodine loading comparisons between activated carbon, zeolite, alumina, aerogel, and xerogel sorbents

Different sorbents, including activated carbons, an Ag-aerogel, Ag-xerogels, an Ag-alumina, an Ag-zeolite, a Ag 2 S-polyacrylonitrile composite, and a carbon foam were investigated for static I 2(g) loading at 71 °C for 56 d followed by 4.7 d of desorption. The iodine loadings were 630-1249 mg g −1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNew journal of chemistry Vol. 48; no. 22; pp. 988 - 9884
Main Authors Chong, Saehwa, Riley, Brian J, Baskaran, Karthikeyan, Sullivan, Sean, El Khoury, Luke, Carlson, Krista, Asmussen, R. Matthew, Fountain, Matthew S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge Royal Society of Chemistry 04.06.2024
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Subjects
Activated carbon
Aerogels
Aluminum oxide
Iodine
Polyacrylonitrile
Sorbents
Xerogels
Zeolites
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Different sorbents, including activated carbons, an Ag-aerogel, Ag-xerogels, an Ag-alumina, an Ag-zeolite, a Ag 2 S-polyacrylonitrile composite, and a carbon foam were investigated for static I 2(g) loading at 71 °C for 56 d followed by 4.7 d of desorption. The iodine loadings were 630-1249 mg g −1 for activated carbons and 87-744 mg g −1 for other sorbents. Different sorbents, including activated carbons, an aerogel, xerogels, an alumina, a zeolite, and a carbon foam were investigated for static I 2(g) loading at 71 °C for 56 d followed by 4.7 d of desorption.
Bibliography:Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d4nj01314j
USDOE
NE000890; 89304021CEM000014
ISSN:1144-0546
1369-9261
DOI:10.1039/d4nj01314j