Can antibiotic-resistant nosocomial infections be controlled?

Three decades ago infection-control programmes were created to control antibiotic-resistant nosocomial infections, but numbers of these infections have continued to increase, leading many to question whether control is feasible. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant ent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Lancet infectious diseases Vol. 1; no. 1; pp. 38 - 45
Main Authors Farr, Barry M, Salgado, Cassandra D, Karchmer, Tobi B, Sherertz, Robert J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Ltd 01.08.2001
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Three decades ago infection-control programmes were created to control antibiotic-resistant nosocomial infections, but numbers of these infections have continued to increase, leading many to question whether control is feasible. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci were major problems during the 1990s. Many hospitals have tried antibiotic control but with limited efficacy against these pathogens. Studies of antibiotic restriction, substitution, and cycling have been promising, but more definitive data are needed. Increased compliance with hand hygiene would help but is unlikely to control this problem alone as a result of frequent contamination of other surfaces even when hands are cleansed and high transmission rates when hand hygiene is neglected. For 17 years, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have recommended contact precautions for preventing nosocomial spread of important antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Many studies confirm that this approach works when sufficient active-surveillance cultures are undertaken to detect the reservoir for spread. However, most health care facilities have not yet tried this approach.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1473-3099
1474-4457
DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(01)00020-2