Simulated scenario models to assess the long-term effects of Cr(VI)-contaminated soils remediated with typical iron-bearing reductants

Purpose The chemical reduction of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil can be subject to re-oxidation when the external environment changes, and it is therefore crucial to assess the long-term stability of the remediated soil. Materials and methods In this work, we systematically investigated the remediation pe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of soils and sediments Vol. 24; no. 5; pp. 1988 - 2000
Main Authors Zhang, Xiaoming, He, Yuhong, Li, Qi, Liao, Qi, Si, Mengying, Yang, Zhihui, Yang, Weichun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.05.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose The chemical reduction of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil can be subject to re-oxidation when the external environment changes, and it is therefore crucial to assess the long-term stability of the remediated soil. Materials and methods In this work, we systematically investigated the remediation performance of nano-zerovalent iron (nZVI), ferrous sulfate (FeSO 4 ), and zerovalent iron/pyrite (ZVI/FeS 2 ) in Cr(VI)-contaminated soil, with particular emphasis on assessing the long-term stability of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil after their remediation by adopting various simulated scenarios models, including freeze–thaw cycles (FTC) aging, acid rain (AR) leaching, alternating wet-dry (AWD), and extreme oxidation. Results and discussion The results showed that compared to nZVI and FeSO 4 , ZVI/FeS 2 exhibited superior Cr(VI) reduction performance with a reduction efficiency of 99.8% and improved the richness and diversity of soil microbial community. The stability of Cr in soils remediated with ZVI/FeS 2 and FeSO 4 was not significantly affected by FTC, AR leaching, and AWD, with almost no changes in Cr(VI) content in the two soils under any circumstance, except for a slight increase in Cr(VI) concentration in FeSO 4 treated one under AWD condition. By contrast, the addition of exogenous Mn oxides led to an increase in total Cr(VI) concentration of 167.98, 136.35, and 50.35 mg kg −1 in the control, FeSO 4 , and ZVI/FeS 2 -treated soil, respectively. The ZVI/FeS 2 treated one exhibited preferable resistance to Cr(VI) re-oxidation. Conclusions Our findings illustrated that soil oxidation condition is an important factor affecting the long-term stability of remediated Cr(VI)-contaminated soil and provided critical information on guidance of selecting reducing materials for Cr(VI)-contaminated soil remediation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1439-0108
1614-7480
DOI:10.1007/s11368-024-03761-6