Simulated scenario models to assess the long-term effects of Cr(VI)-contaminated soils remediated with typical iron-bearing reductants
Purpose The chemical reduction of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil can be subject to re-oxidation when the external environment changes, and it is therefore crucial to assess the long-term stability of the remediated soil. Materials and methods In this work, we systematically investigated the remediation pe...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of soils and sediments Vol. 24; no. 5; pp. 1988 - 2000 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01.05.2024
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Purpose
The chemical reduction of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil can be subject to re-oxidation when the external environment changes, and it is therefore crucial to assess the long-term stability of the remediated soil.
Materials and methods
In this work, we systematically investigated the remediation performance of nano-zerovalent iron (nZVI), ferrous sulfate (FeSO
4
), and zerovalent iron/pyrite (ZVI/FeS
2
) in Cr(VI)-contaminated soil, with particular emphasis on assessing the long-term stability of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil after their remediation by adopting various simulated scenarios models, including freeze–thaw cycles (FTC) aging, acid rain (AR) leaching, alternating wet-dry (AWD), and extreme oxidation.
Results and discussion
The results showed that compared to nZVI and FeSO
4
, ZVI/FeS
2
exhibited superior Cr(VI) reduction performance with a reduction efficiency of 99.8% and improved the richness and diversity of soil microbial community. The stability of Cr in soils remediated with ZVI/FeS
2
and FeSO
4
was not significantly affected by FTC, AR leaching, and AWD, with almost no changes in Cr(VI) content in the two soils under any circumstance, except for a slight increase in Cr(VI) concentration in FeSO
4
treated one under AWD condition. By contrast, the addition of exogenous Mn oxides led to an increase in total Cr(VI) concentration of 167.98, 136.35, and 50.35 mg kg
−1
in the control, FeSO
4
, and ZVI/FeS
2
-treated soil, respectively. The ZVI/FeS
2
treated one exhibited preferable resistance to Cr(VI) re-oxidation.
Conclusions
Our findings illustrated that soil oxidation condition is an important factor affecting the long-term stability of remediated Cr(VI)-contaminated soil and provided critical information on guidance of selecting reducing materials for Cr(VI)-contaminated soil remediation. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1439-0108 1614-7480 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11368-024-03761-6 |