Unobserved covariates in the two-sample comparison of survival times: a maximin efficiency robust test

In analysing a clinical trial with the logrank test, the hazards between the two groups are usually assumed to be proportional. Nevertheless, this hypothesis is no longer valid with unobserved covariates. As a consequence, there is a loss of power of the logrank test for testing the null hypothesis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStatistics in medicine Vol. 18; no. 14; pp. 1791 - 1800
Main Authors Broët, Philippe, Moreau, Thierry, Lellouch, Joseph, Asselain, Bernard
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 30.07.1999
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In analysing a clinical trial with the logrank test, the hazards between the two groups are usually assumed to be proportional. Nevertheless, this hypothesis is no longer valid with unobserved covariates. As a consequence, there is a loss of power of the logrank test for testing the null hypothesis H0 of no treatment effect. We propose a test suited for taking into account unobserved covariates. The proposed approach is based on a proportional hazard frailty model whereby the omitted covariates are considered as an unobserved frailty variable. The procedure is as follows. In a first step, the weighted logrank test optimal for testing H0 against a general proportional hazard frailty model is obtained and its specialization for a gamma frailty variable is derived. In a second step, the proposed test is obtained by combining the maximin efficiency robustness principle and the gamma frailty distribution properties. Simulation studies investigate the power properties of the test for different frailty distributions. A breast cancer clinical trial is analysed as an example. The proposed test might be recommended rather than the logrank for practical situations in which one expects heterogeneity related to omitted covariates. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-MHSWV4KX-D
istex:2C8BBD5BB344E1772F228041871A2419988BFC73
ArticleID:SIM215
ISSN:0277-6715
1097-0258
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990730)18:14<1791::AID-SIM215>3.0.CO;2-W