An International and Multidisciplinary Consensus on the Labeling of Spatial Neglect Using a Modified Delphi Method

Survivors of neurologic injury (most commonly stroke or traumatic brain injury) frequently experience a disorder in which contralesionally positioned objects or the contralesional features of individual objects are often left unattended or underappreciated. The disorder is known by >200 unique la...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation Vol. 6; no. 2; p. 100343
Main Authors Rich, Timothy J., Williams, Lindy J., Bowen, Audrey, Eskes, Gail A., Hreha, Kimberly, Checketts, Matthew, Mancuso, Mauro, Fordell, Helena, Chen, Peii
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2024
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Survivors of neurologic injury (most commonly stroke or traumatic brain injury) frequently experience a disorder in which contralesionally positioned objects or the contralesional features of individual objects are often left unattended or underappreciated. The disorder is known by >200 unique labels in the literature, which potentially causes confusion for patients and their families, complicates literature searches for researchers and clinicians, and promotes a fractionated conceptualization of the disorder. The objective of this Delphi was to determine if consensus (≥75% agreement) could be reached by an international and multidisciplinary panel of researchers and clinicians with expertise on the topic. To accomplish this aim, we used a modified Delphi method in which 66 researchers and/or clinicians with expertise on the topic completed at least 1 of 4 iterative rounds of surveys. Per the Delphi method, panelists were provided with results from each round prior to responding to the survey in the subsequent round with the explicit intention of achieving consensus. The panel ultimately reached consensus that the disorder should be consistently labeled spatial neglect. Based on the consensus reached by our expert panel, we recommend that researchers and clinicians use the label spatial neglect when describing the disorder in general and more specific labels pertaining to subtypes of the disorder when appropriate.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2590-1095
2590-1095
DOI:10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100343