Modelling the ground heat flux of an urban area using remote sensing data

During the Basel Urban Boundary Layer Experiment (BUBBLE) conducted in 2002, micrometeorological in-situ data were collected for different sites using a variety of instruments. This provides a unique data set for urban climate studies. Nevertheless, the spatial distribution of energy and heat fluxes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTheoretical and applied climatology Vol. 90; no. 3-4; pp. 185 - 199
Main Authors RIGO, G, PARLOW, E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Wien Springer 01.11.2007
New York, NY Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:During the Basel Urban Boundary Layer Experiment (BUBBLE) conducted in 2002, micrometeorological in-situ data were collected for different sites using a variety of instruments. This provides a unique data set for urban climate studies. Nevertheless, the spatial distribution of energy and heat fluxes can only be taken into account with remote sensing methods or numerical models. Therefore, multiple satellite images from different platforms (NOAA-AVHRR, MODIS and LANDSAT ETM+) were acquired, processed and analysed. In addition, a high resolution digital elevation model (DEM) and a 1m resolution digital surface model (DSM) of a large part of the city of Basel was utilized. This paper focuses on the calculation and modelling of the ground (or storage) heat flux density using remotely sensed data combined with in-situ measurements using three different approaches. First, an empirical regression function was generated to estimate the storage heat flux from NDVI values second approach used the Objective Hysteresis Model (OHM) which is often used for in-situ measurements. The last method used information of the geometric parameters of urban street canyons, computed from the high resolution digital urban surface model. Modelled and measured data are found to be in agreement within +/- 30Wm-2 and result in a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.95. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0177-798X
1434-4483
DOI:10.1007/s00704-006-0279-8