Comparison of approaches and measurement of continuing professional development for specialists in laboratory medicine within four European countries

This study investigated approaches to continuing professional development (CPD) for specialists in laboratory medicine within four European countries: Croatia, the Czech Republic, Malta and the UK. The research questions focussed on ascertaining if continued registration/licence was linked to CPD an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Vol. 53; no. 1; pp. 35 - 44
Main Authors Martin, Jan, Gasljevic, Visnja, Šálek, Tomáš, Horvath, Attila, Borg, Charles, Flegar-Meštrić, Zlata, Jakovcic, Mladen, Silhavik, Josef, Adonics, Adrienn, Szlamka, Zsófia, Brincat, Ian, Buttigieg, Dorianne, Ciantar, Noel, Sciortino, Anna Lisa, Mifsud, Antoinette, Adkins, Alison, Bennett, Tracey, Rice, Kirstie, Taylor, Yvette
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany De Gruyter 01.01.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study investigated approaches to continuing professional development (CPD) for specialists in laboratory medicine within four European countries: Croatia, the Czech Republic, Malta and the UK. The research questions focussed on ascertaining if continued registration/licence was linked to CPD and if so, were there requirements for certain amounts and types of CPD and for CPD activities to meet specified accreditation criteria. The Professional Associations Research Network (PARN) model of CPD measurement was applied to each country’s registration/licencing body’s CPD requirements. Our results indicate a spectrum of approaches to CPD within participating countries. It will be necessary for European employers to be familiar with these differences and to take them into account for this increasingly mobile European workforce.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1434-6621
1437-4331
DOI:10.1515/cclm-2014-0415