Impact of COVID-19 pandemic healthcare restrictions on utilisation and diagnostic yield of outpatient transthoracic echocardiograms

• Published in: Cardiology in the young Vol. 33; no. 10; pp. 1936 - 1941
• Main Authors: Scott, Michael W., Metcalf, Christina, Bhadury, Sagnik, Feygin, Yana, Neal, Ashley E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.10.2023
• Subjects: Cardiology; Charts; Classification; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Diagnostic systems; Disease transmission; Echocardiography; Echocardiography and Scans; Indication; Original Article; Pandemics; Pediatrics; Statistical analysis; Ultrasonic imaging; United States > US; Kentucky; Paediatric; appropriate use criteria; echocardiogram; cardiology
• ISSN: 1047-9511; 1467-1107
• DOI: 10.1017/S1047951122003535

Abstract Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Kentucky prohibited elective medical procedures from 3/18/2020-4/27/2020. We sought to determine if cessation of elective procedures in Kentucky during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a decrease in the proportion of rarely appropriate outpatient transthoracic echocardiograms interpreted at the open echocardiography lab at Norton Children’s Hospital. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted comparing proportions of rarely appropriate outpatient paediatric transthoracic echocardiograms performed pre-COVID (3/21/2019-4/28/2019) and during COVID (3/19/2020-4/27/2020). Transthoracic echocardiogram indication was determined by chart review and echocardiogram reports. Indication appropriateness was evaluated using paediatric appropriate use criteria for initial outpatient transthoracic echocardiogram or CHD follow-up as applicable. Results: Of transthoracic echocardiograms pre-COVID, 100 (37.7%) were rarely appropriate versus 18 (20.2%) during COVID. Pre-COVID, paediatric cardiologists tended to order fewer rarely appropriate transthoracic echocardiograms than paediatricians (35.9% versus 46.4%), although this difference was not statistically significant. Cardiologists ordered the majority of outpatient transthoracic echocardiograms during COVID (77/89, 86.5%), limiting the ability to compare transthoracic echocardiogram indications by provider type. There was no significant difference in diagnostic yield of initial outpatient transthoracic echocardiograms with (13.0%) abnormal studies pre-COVID versus 7 (15.5%) during COVID. Conclusion: While elective procedures were prohibited in Kentucky during the COVID-19 pandemic, a decrease in the proportion of rarely appropriate outpatient paediatric transthoracic echocardiograms was observed. There was no significant difference in diagnostic yield of initial outpatient transthoracic echocardiograms between time periods, suggesting that clinically significant echocardiogram findings were still detected despite more prudent utilisation of echocardiography during this time.