The golden rule and the requirement of universalizability

There are many formulations of the golden rule in different religions and moral theories, and this has occasioned a protracted debate on the conceptual unity of the rule. The golden rule and the requirement of universalizability implicitly entail two related tests of publicity. To be acceptable, a p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of value inquiry Vol. 39; no. 2; pp. 155 - 168
Main Author REINIKAINEN, Jouni
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer 01.06.2005
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Hobbes, Thomas (1588-1679)
Jewish people
Kant, Immanuel (1724-1804)
Law
Morality
Philosophy
Religion
Theory of values and moral philosophy
Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action
New York
United States > US
Moral philosophy
Universalizability
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:There are many formulations of the golden rule in different religions and moral theories, and this has occasioned a protracted debate on the conceptual unity of the rule. The golden rule and the requirement of universalizability implicitly entail two related tests of publicity. To be acceptable, a principle, a law, or a course of action must be judged from the standpoint of all affected. This follows from the tests of an adequate use that these procedures implicitly require. The application of the golden rule as a test on the use of the rule only permits judgments that are acceptable from the point of view of everyone affected. Thinkers who accept the universalizability requirement as a test of moral rightness should also see the golden rule as a justifiable procedure.
ISSN:0022-5363
1573-0492
DOI:10.1007/s10790-006-8363-y