Is conservative treatment still gold standard for the management of both-bone forearm fracture in children?

Background: Forearm diaphyseal fractures constitute around 6% of all other children's fractures. Despite conservative management is proven and gold standard but still operative management is on rise. Aims and Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome in conservative and surgi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth Vol. 13; no. 6; pp. 653 - 657
Main Authors Patil, Rohan, Waghela, Ankit, Medhi, Mriganka, Badole, Chandrashekhar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd 2020
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Forearm diaphyseal fractures constitute around 6% of all other children's fractures. Despite conservative management is proven and gold standard but still operative management is on rise. Aims and Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome in conservative and surgical management of both-bone forearm fractures in children. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted in children aged 3–12 years. Clinical and radiological features, time for union, angular correction over a period of management, and functional outcome were assessed. Data were entered and analyzed with Epi Info software. Results: There were 48 males (72.7%) and 18 (27.3%) females, with a mean age of 85 months (±29.7). In the present study, 34 (51.2%) at middle third was the most common site of diaphyseal fracture followed by distal third 28 (42.2) and proximal one-third. Conclusion: Fractures treated conservatively had greater healing potential and faster healing, whereas functional outcome was comparable in both conservatively and surgically treated patients.
ISSN:2589-8302
2278-7119
DOI:10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_172_19