MR microscopy of the human finger and correlation with histology-a proof-of-principle study

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with small surface coils is a well established method for the diagnostic evaluation of finger masses. Until now, histological examination has been required to reliably assess tumor extent and infiltration of surrounding structures. Ultra‐high‐field MR microscopy (MRM...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 26; no. 6; pp. 719 - 727
Main Authors Langner, I., Krüger, P.-C., Evert, K., Zach, A., Hadlich, S., Ekkernkamp, A., Eisenschenk, A., Hosten, N., Langner, S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with small surface coils is a well established method for the diagnostic evaluation of finger masses. Until now, histological examination has been required to reliably assess tumor extent and infiltration of surrounding structures. Ultra‐high‐field MR microscopy (MRM) allows evaluation of anatomical structures and pathologies with submillimeter resolution. This study describes the diagnostic prospects and potential of MRM based on the ex‐vivo examination of different finger pathologies. Ten human digits were examined by ex‐vivo MRM at 7.1 Tesla (ClinScan, Bruker BioScan) using a T2‐weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence. Imaging parameters were: TE 48 ms; TR 8370 ms; slice thickness 700 µm; matrix size 1024 × 1024 pixels; FOV 37 × 37 mm; in‐plane resolution 36 × 36 µm/voxel. Afterwards specimens were examined histologically. Histology and MRM were correlated. MRM allowed evaluation of the anatomy of the nail, the tendon insertions, the distal interphalangeal joint, and the neurovascular bundles. Finger abnormalities evaluated by MRM included osteomyelitis and metastatic disease. Subsequent histological examination confirmed MRM findings regarding origin, internal makeup, and extent of the structures visualized. This study demonstrates the potential of MRM for imaging small anatomical structures and pathologies of the human finger. Our ex‐vivo findings correlate strongly with histology, suggesting that MRM may gain a central role in assessing anatomical structures and pathology in terms of morphology, extent, and infiltration of surrounding structures. Therefore, with increasing availability, MRM is expected to become an essential tool not only in experimental studies but also for daily routine. Clin. Anat. 26:719–727, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:ArticleID:CA22232
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research BMBF - No. 0314107
istex:CA82F148688A5A7879170C07E381B67EA3F98B37
ark:/67375/WNG-TQZ9LB7H-K
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0897-3806
1098-2353
DOI:10.1002/ca.22232