Developing a Health Surveillance System for People With Intellectual Disabilities in the United States

Adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) experience poorer access to quality healthcare and poorer health outcomes than people without ID. They are more likely to live with complex and poorly managed health conditions, have limited access to quality healthcare, receive cancer screenings at lower r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities Vol. 7; no. 3; pp. 155 - 166
Main Authors Krahn, Gloria, Fox, Michael H., Campbell, Vincent A., Ramon, Ismaila, Jesien, George
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.09.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) experience poorer access to quality healthcare and poorer health outcomes than people without ID. They are more likely to live with complex and poorly managed health conditions, have limited access to quality healthcare, receive cancer screenings at lower rates, be obese, have undetected vision and hearing problems, and be at risk for overuse of psychotropic medications. While health disparities appear endemic, there remains a dearth of population‐based information, leading to lack of recognition of this problem by policy makers, public health, and even healthcare professionals. Efforts to address these disparities are insufficient, owing in part to the challenge of documenting the problem's scope and nature. In the U.S., nearly 4 million adults are currently estimated to have ID. In contrast to European countries and despite attention from the U.S. Surgeon General in 2002 on the poor health of people with ID, little progress has been made on obtaining related population‐based data in the U.S. Substantial challenges exist relative to gathering representative data on the population with ID. In response, two international meetings of experts were convened to discuss possible approaches to gathering population‐based health information on people with ID. The discussions included about whom to gather information, what data to collect, and options for how to gather the data. Authors note that efforts to improve health surveillance of people with ID in the U.S. can be enhanced through a multistage strategy. Recent healthcare reform in the U.S. sets a new context for major changes in access to and the way that our healthcare system operates. These changes highlight the need to develop accurate and reliable surveillance systems that can monitor the impact of these changes on this often neglected population.
Bibliography:istex:004662F48A9BB8103BC963A57789B457F0DC5974
ArticleID:JPPI260
ark:/67375/WNG-THTCW3ML-S
Note: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
ISSN:1741-1122
1741-1130
DOI:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2010.00260.x