Comparison of three methods for the quantification of β-cell function and insulin sensitivity

The purpose of this study was to compare two techniques for the quantification of β-cell function and insulin sensitivity. Sixteen subjects (2 with newly diagnosed non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, 8 with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and 6 with normal glucose tolerance (NGT)), aged 40–65...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetes research and clinical practice Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. 189 - 195
Main Authors Nijpels, G., van der Wal, P.S., Bouter, L.M., Heine, R.J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Shannon Elsevier Ireland Ltd 31.12.1994
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of this study was to compare two techniques for the quantification of β-cell function and insulin sensitivity. Sixteen subjects (2 with newly diagnosed non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, 8 with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and 6 with normal glucose tolerance (NGT)), aged 40–65 years underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), a continuous infusion of glucose with model assessment (CIGMA) and a hyperglycaemic clamp (10 mmol/l) in random order. As measures of β-cell function we used the clamp derived area under the curve from 0–10 min (first phase insulin response) and the mean insulin level during the last 20 min of the clamp (second phase insulin response). Insulin sensitivity was reflected by the ratio of the glucose infusion rate and the mean insulin level during the last 20 min of the clamp ( M I ratio). Measures for β-cell function and insulin sensitivity derived from OGTT and CIGMA appeared to correlate only moderately (0.5–0.7) with the corresponding clamp measures. It is concluded that OGTT and CIGMA derived measures of β-cell function and insulin sensitivity should be interpreted with caution.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0168-8227
1872-8227
DOI:10.1016/0168-8227(94)90060-4