Liberal–conservative dimension of moral concerns underlying political faction formation in Taiwan

• Published in: Asian journal of social psychology Vol. 22; no. 3; pp. 301 - 315
• Main Authors: Hsu, Han‐Yu, Huang, Li‐Li, Hwang, Kwang‐Kuo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2019
• Subjects: Cheating; China unification; Communication; Decriminalization; Independence; Loyalty; moral foundations theory; political factions; Protection; Research ethics; Taiwan independence; China; Taiwan
• ISSN: 1367-2223; 1467-839X
• DOI: 10.1111/ajsp.12367

Moral foundations theory provides a framework for understanding the traditional liberal–conservative dichotomy in political factions. Typically, factions on the liberal side are more concerned with individualizing foundations—including care/harm and fairness/cheating—for the protection of individual rights and welfare whereas factions on the conservative side are concerned with both individualizing and binding foundations—including loyalty/betrayal, authority/subversion, and sanctity/degradation—for the maintenance of existing social ethics. Our research extended this framework to the analysis of Taiwanese political factions, which are not distributed conspicuously along the liberal–conservative line but instead on whether Taiwan should become a legally independent state or unify with the People's Republic of China (Mainland China). Our results indicate that despite the scarce use of the terms liberal or left and conservative or right in common communication, a liberal–conservative dimension underlies the Taiwanese political spectrum. Specifically, supporters of Taiwan independence exhibit liberal‐like moral concerns whereas supporters of China unification and the status quo demonstrate conservative‐like moral concerns. Moreover, indirect effects exist through moral foundations from political factions to stances on social issues; this is especially prevalent in the case of Taiwan independence camp's clear support for the legalization of same‐sex marriage, a stance resulting from anti‐authoritarian moral and political characteristics.