Success in agenda setting through failure in policymaking: Exploring a new policy venue in the Polish European Semester 2012–2022

• Published in: International journal of social welfare Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 113 - 125
• Main Author: Szarfenberg, Ryszard
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2023
• Subjects: Advocacy; Agenda; Agenda setting; Amicus curiae; Case studies; Civil society; Coordination; European Semester; open method of coordination; Pandemics; Participant observation; Policy making; policy research to guide organisational decision making; policy venue; Poverty; poverty/welfare reform; Social participation; Social policy; social policy/social welfare policy; Success; Venue; Poland
• ISSN: 1369-6866; 1468-2397
• DOI: 10.1111/ijsw.12575

The article presents the results of a case study based on participant observation of a policy venue which was established in Poland as part of the implementation of the European Semester (ES) in 2012. The long period (2012–2022) and the rich material collected by the insider in the studied venue (as a representative of over 30 civil society organisations affiliated to EAPN Poland) provide a unique opportunity to gain insight into the participation of social actors in the coordination of economic and social policy in the European Union after 2010. The main research question addressed in the article is: why did social actors gain influence on the agenda of the policy venue, but not on national social policy? Social actors participating in the European Semester in Poland, despite strong and competent representation in the policy venue under consideration, and despite their collaboration with other stakeholders, did not directly influence national poverty reduction policies. However, they strongly influenced the agenda of the policy venue, establishing poverty as a permanent item in the agenda of the subsequent ES cycles 2014–2019. The explanation of this course of action is the institutional framework of the policy venue studied in this article, the policy advocacy strategy adopted by the social actors within it in 2013–2015 and the institutional events triggered by the pandemic in 2020–2022.