Industrial Symbiosis at the Facility Scale

Summary Industrial symbiosis (IS), as a subfield of industrial ecology, is concerned with cooperation among industrial firms in managing resources, particularly by‐products, such that the waste of one firm becomes the input of another. This “closed‐loop” pattern also lies at the heart of the concept...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of industrial ecology Vol. 21; no. 3; pp. 559 - 571
Main Authors Mulrow, John S., Derrible, Sybil, Ashton, Weslynne S., Chopra, Shauhrat S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New Haven Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.06.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Industrial symbiosis (IS), as a subfield of industrial ecology, is concerned with cooperation among industrial firms in managing resources, particularly by‐products, such that the waste of one firm becomes the input of another. This “closed‐loop” pattern also lies at the heart of the concept of the circular economy (CE). Both concepts are typically considered at scales ranging from industrial parks to global supply chains, but rarely at the scale of a single facility housing multiple firms. Moreover, both concepts have requirements and implications that reach beyond the tracking and coordination of material flows. These additional requirements include the cultivation of new business models and political support, as well as engagement of local communities and cultures. Thus, both IS and the CE face the challenge of bridging the gap between the technical and sociocultural aspects of industrial development and adapting to the facility scale. We address this challenge by proposing a framework for the development of facility‐scale industrial symbiosis (Facility‐IS). Facility‐IS accounts for the presence of symbiotic interfirm relationships—including, but not limited to, material and knowledge exchange—within a single physical facility. The conditions for planning, facilitating, and growing Facility‐IS are outlined, as well as three approaches to implement such projects. Overall, this research forms a Facility‐IS framework rooted in existing best practices for understanding the CE at the local scale, tracking business sustainability factors and assessing viable strategies that facilitate IS.
Bibliography:Conflict of interest statement
John Mulrow was previously employed by Plant Chicago, a not‐for‐profit organization featured in the Facility‐IS Projects section. The other authors have no conflict to declare.
ISSN:1088-1980
1530-9290
DOI:10.1111/jiec.12592