Breaking out of the grips of dichotomous discourse in teacher post-observation debrief conversations

Educational discourse is dominated by problematic dichotomies, for example, between teacher- and learner-centred pedagogies, and between teacher control and pupil autonomy. Such dichotomies impede attempts to understand and address complex educational problems, and thwart productive discussion among...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTeaching and teacher education Vol. 67; pp. 418 - 428
Main Authors Lefstein, Adam, Trachtenberg-Maslaton, Rotem, Pollak, Itay
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Educational discourse is dominated by problematic dichotomies, for example, between teacher- and learner-centred pedagogies, and between teacher control and pupil autonomy. Such dichotomies impede attempts to understand and address complex educational problems, and thwart productive discussion among practitioners and the public. This article examines how teachers in one Israeli school addressed dichotomous discourse around classroom management in video-based post-observation debrief conversations. Three ways of coping with dichotomies are conceptualized: either/or, synthesis and both/and. Factors contributing to the emergence of non-dichotomous discourse are discussed, including ambivalent leadership, the use of video representations, flattened hierarchies, and a focus on issues and dilemmas. •Dichotomous discourse plagues educational thinking and discussion.•Three ways of coping with dichotomies are discussed.•Teachers coped with dichotomous discourse in video-based feedback conversations.•Factors contributing to non-dichotomous discourse are identified.
ISSN:0742-051X
1879-2480
DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2017.07.010