Development and Usability of an Inexpensive and Reusable Phantom for Ultrasound-Guided Needle Cannulation

• Published in: Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) Vol. 16; no. 1; p. e52583
• Main Authors: Linnet, Jacob, Obinah, Magnús P, Madsen, Mikkel H, Møller, Magnus M, Russell, Lene, Ekelund, Kim, Svendsen, Morten B, Thinggaard, Ebbe
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Cureus Inc 19.01.2024; Cureus
• Subjects: Anesthesia; Anesthesiology; Catheters; Clinical medicine; Curricula; Demography; Emergency medical care; Emergency Medicine; Hospitals; Medical Simulation; Patients; Questionnaires; Silicones; Simulation; Statistical analysis; Ultrasonic imaging; Usability; Venous access; ultrasound phantom; anesthesiology; peripheral vein catheter; emergency medicine; ultrasound guided; simulation trainer
• ISSN: 2168-8184; 2168-8184
• DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52583

Introduction Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter placement (UG-PVCP) is a key skill for establishing intravenous access, especially in patients with anatomical challenges. Ultrasound is highly operator-dependent, and it is essential to ensure a sufficient level of competence when educating healthcare professionals. Competence can be acquired through simulation-based training (SBT) using phantoms or simulators. We developed a phantom for SBT, and in this study, we explore the phantom's usability and technical fidelity. Methods Novices with no experience in UG-PVCP and experts who routinely performed the procedure were asked to perform three ultrasound-guided catheter placement attempts on the phantom. Afterward, they were asked to complete a usability questionnaire consisting of 14 questions exploring the usability and fidelity of the phantom. Results Fifty-seven participants were included in the study: 29 novices and 28 experts. When assessing positive questions about the frequency of use, ease of use, integration of functionality, quickness to learn, and confidence level, the study showed a median score of 4 to 5 out of 5 in the two groups. The median was 1 to 2 out of 5 for negative questions assessing cumbersomeness, unnecessary complexity, and model inconsistency. In an additional comment textbox, one participant mentioned that the cannulation did not feel realistic but that it was good for cannulation practice. Conclusions We believe the phantom is suitable for an educational curriculum since it shows a high level of usability, scoring high on positive questions while scoring low on negative questions, and having high functional fidelity.