Predicting Daily PM2.5 Exposure with Spatially Invariant Accuracy Using Co-Existing Pollutant Concentrations as Predictors

• Published in: Atmosphere Vol. 13; no. 5; p. 782
• Main Authors: Araki, Shin, Shimadera, Hikari, Hasunuma, Hideki, Yoda, Yoshiko, Shima, Masayuki
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.05.2022
• Subjects: Accuracy; Air pollution; Algorithms; Cohorts; Daily; Epidemiology; Estimates; fine particulate matter; Japan; Machine learning; Model accuracy; Modelling; Monitoring; Outdoor air quality; Particulate matter; Performance evaluation; Pollutants; Prediction models; random forests; Roads & highways; Variables; United States > US; Japan
• ISSN: 2073-4433; 2073-4433
• DOI: 10.3390/atmos13050782

The spatiotemporal variation of PM2.5 should be accurately estimated for epidemiological studies. However, the accuracy of prediction models may change over geographical space, which is not conducive for proper exposure assessment. In this study, we developed a prediction model to estimate daily PM2.5 concentrations from 2010 to 2017 in the Kansai region of Japan with co-existing pollutant concentrations as predictors. The overall objective was to obtain daily estimates over the study domain with spatially homogeneous accuracy. We used random forest algorithm to model the relationship between the daily PM2.5 concentrations and various predictors. The model performance was evaluated via spatial and temporal cross-validation and the daily PM2.5 surface was estimated from 2010 to 2017 at a 1 km × 1 km resolution. We achieved R2 values of 0.91 and 0.92 for spatial and temporal cross-validation, respectively. The prediction accuracy for each monitoring site was found to be consistently high, regardless of the distance to the nearest monitoring location, up to 10 km. Even for distances greater than 10 km, the mean R2 value was 0.88. Our approach yielded spatially homogeneous prediction accuracy, which is beneficial for epidemiological studies. The daily PM2.5 estimates will be used in a related birth cohort study to evaluate the potential impact on human health.