A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Role of Combined Diagnostic Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy in the Management of Female Infertility

• Published in: Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) Vol. 16; no. 1; p. e52170
• Main Authors: Sharma, Parul, Jhanwar, Ambika, Kumari, Kamlesh, Arya, Jyoti, Bharti, Bhavna, Majeed, Bushra, Dabas, Daxita
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Cureus Inc 12.01.2024; Cureus
• Subjects: Age groups; Case reports; Cervix; Chi-square test; Endometrium; Fallopian tubes; Females; Infertility; Laparoscopy; Medical diagnosis; Menstruation; Obstetrics/Gynecology; Ovaries; Pathology; Patients; Uterus; Germany; India; laparoscopy; chromopertubation; infertility; hysteroscopy; hysterosalpingography
• ISSN: 2168-8184; 2168-8184
• DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52170

Introduction Infertility affects approximately 10-15% of couples worldwide. Hysteroscopy and laparoscopy are two newer modalities available for the evaluation of infertility and are complementary rather than mutually exclusive. Each provides useful information that the other may not have and each has its advantages. Materials and methods A total of 75 patients of female infertility (study group) in the age group of 18-40 years from the Outpatient Department (OPD) were recruited. Infertility was defined as one year of unprotected intercourse without pregnancy. Hysteroscopy and laparoscopy were carried out in each patient at the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Hysteroscopic findings were compared with laparoscopic findings for uterine and tubal pathology. Hysteroscopy as a procedure was also compared with laparoscopy as a one-step procedure for diagnostic accuracy in investigating a case of female infertility. The data was analyzed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Version 29.0, Armonk, NY). Observations and results In our study, out of a total of 75 cases evaluated for infertility, primary infertility patients were 48 (64%) and secondary infertility patients were 27 (36%). In our study, both tubes were patent on chromopertubation in primary infertility (PI) vs secondary infertility (SI) in 49.33% vs 21.33% of total cases. Both tubes were blocked in PI vs SI in 9.33% vs 8% of total cases. In our study, 20 patients (26.66%) underwent hysteroscopic intervention. Adhesiolysis was the commonest procedure required in seven (9.33%) followed by hysteroscopic cannulation in six (8%). In our study, a total of 30 procedures were performed in 20 patients during laparoscopy. The most common procedure required was ovarian drilling in 22.66% (17/75) followed by surgery for endometriosis in 10.66% (8/75). Adhesiolysis was required in 5/75 (6.66%). Both laparoscopy and hysteroscopy were normal in 44/75 cases for uterine findings. Conclusion Thus, hysterolaparoscopy as "one step" had various advantages in our study, more accuracy in the findings and therapeutic intervention in the same sitting reducing the cost. The addition of hysteroscopy to laparoscopy is invaluable in the infertility workup as it has a definite edge in the detection of uterine pathology, as well as being therapeutic at the same time. More accuracy in the diagnostic findings and therapeutic intervention in the same setting will help in reducing the time and cost of treatment.