Socioeconomic impacts of urban restoration in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil

• Published in: Urban forestry & urban greening Vol. 64; p. 127271
• Main Authors: Lemgruber, Luisa S., Maioli, Veronica, Latawiec, Agnieszka E., Solórzano, Alexandro, Moraes, Luiz F.D., Lino, Eric D.S.M., Pena, Ingrid A.B., Strassburg, Bernardo B.N.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier GmbH 01.09.2021
• Subjects: Atlantic Forest; Mutirão Reflorestamento project; Social indicators; Urban ecological restoration; Atlantic Forest; Urban ecological restoration; Social indicators; Mutirão Reflorestamento project
• ISSN: 1618-8667; 1610-8167
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127271

•The success of reforestation can be assessed by the perception of the local community.•Integrating people perception supports continuation and long term effects of projects.•Environmental consciousness can be a powerful tool to protect the restored areas. Ecological restoration provides a range of ecosystem services. However, the social aspects of restoration are rarely reported. Here we assess the socioeconomic effects of the restoration project called "Mutirão Reflorestamento" (MR), located in an urban fragment of Atlantic Forest in Rio de Janeiro. We conducted a survey in eight communities, involving 139 residents, where 62 worked for the MR Project, and 77 were not directly involved. To collect the data, we conducted focus groups (N = 23, totalling 62 participants) and personal interviews (N = 44). We found that the main positive contributions of the MR Project were job creation and increased income. The presence of Forest was also associated with the improvement of air and life quality, for example through the provision of recreational areas. The lack of formal work benefits and recently reduced budget for the project were indicated as negative aspects of the MR Project. The main recommendations to improve the Project were: enhance communication between city hall, residents and MR participants, and the appraisal and recognition of the project participants. The results represent the voices of communities directly involved and impacted by restoration, and they may contribute to improving restoration projects in tropical countries.