FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement analysis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using DNA/RNA-based NGS and FISH

Patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) harboring FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement benefit from targeted therapies, highlighting the need for reliable testing strategies to identify FGFR2 alterations. We assessed 226 iCCA cases using RNA-based NGS, DNA-based NGS, and break-apart FISH to evalu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology
Main Authors Zhang, Xin, Bai, Qianming, Wang, Yulin, Jiang, Zhengzeng, Han, Jing, Xue, Cheng, Huang, Kai, Luan, Lijuan, Huang, Xiaoyong, Huang, Xiaowu, Shi, Guoming, Hou, Yingyong, Ji, Yuan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany 08.04.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0945-6317
1432-2307
1432-2307
DOI10.1007/s00428-025-04067-9

Cover

More Information
Summary:Patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) harboring FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement benefit from targeted therapies, highlighting the need for reliable testing strategies to identify FGFR2 alterations. We assessed 226 iCCA cases using RNA-based NGS, DNA-based NGS, and break-apart FISH to evaluate the effectiveness of these methods in detecting FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement. The detection rates for FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement were 9.7% (22/226) for RNA-based NGS, 7.1% (16/226) for DNA-based NGS, and 10.2% (23/226) for FISH. Among the 26 FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement-positive cases identified by any method, only 15 (57.7%) were positive by all three techniques, yielding a concordance rate of 95.1% (215/226). RNA-based NGS confirmed oncogenic FGFR2 fusion in 81% (21/26) of positive cases and identified five novel oncogenic fusions. Thirty-five percent (6/17) of the partner genes were located on chromosome 10, with BICC1 being the most common fusion partner, while the rest were distributed across the other 9 chromosomes. FISH demonstrated a sensitivity of 95.2% and specificity of 98.5%, compared to oncogenic FGFR2 fusions confirmed by RNA-based NGS, while DNA-based NGS exhibited a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 99.5%, identifying FGFR2 mutations in 4 cases. FGFR2-FISH positive cases displayed no significant heterogeneity in positive cell distribution. Oncogenic FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement was associated with small duct type iCCA, especially in cases with positive serum HBsAg and absent cholangiolocarcinoma components and peripheral liver steatosis. This study provides a comprehensive comparison of three assays for detecting FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement, along with clinicopathologic characterization of oncogenic FGFR2 fusion in iCCA.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0945-6317
1432-2307
1432-2307
DOI:10.1007/s00428-025-04067-9