A systematic review of PIN-entry methods resistant to shoulder-surfing attacks

• Published in: Computers & security Vol. 101; p. 102116
• Main Authors: Binbeshr, Farid, Mat Kiah, M.L., Por, Lip Yee, Zaidan, A.A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2021
• Subjects: Authentication; Observation attack; Password; PIN; Recording attack; Shoulder surfing; Shoulder surfing; Recording attack; Observation attack; PIN; Authentication; Password
• ISSN: 0167-4048; 1872-6208
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2020.102116

•First systematic review on PIN-entry methods resistant to shoulder-surfing attack.•A taxonomy of PIN-entry methods resistant to shoulder-surfing attack is presented.•Evaluation metrics, limitations, and recommendations of PIN methods are discussed.•PIN-entry methods are prone to recording-based shoulder-surfing attack.•Error rate and PIN-entry time are widely adopted as criteria for usability. Although conventional PIN-entry methods are widely used in many daily authentication procedures, they are highly susceptible to shoulder-surfing attacks. A plethora of PIN-entry methods have been proposed in the literature to mitigate such attacks. Unfortunately, none of these methods is capable of replacing the conventional PIN-entry method. This study presents the results of a systematic review of PIN-entry methods resistant to shoulder-surfing attacks so that the main challenges that impede their adoption can be provided along with opportunities for future research. A systematic search was conducted on seven databases using predefined criteria. A test–retest approach was performed by a single author to extract data. A total of 55 articles were included in this review. The review results manifest that PIN-entry methods are classified mainly into direct and indirect inputs. The user study was the standard research method, and error rate and PIN-entry time were the most frequently adopted usability measures. The review argues that a recording-based shoulder-surfing attack is a major threat to PIN-entry methods. Error rate and PIN-entry time are widely adopted criteria for usability. The review indicates that most PIN-entry methods require a high error rate and PIN-entry time than the conventional method. Moreover, the lack of a standard evaluation framework should be addressed.