Injuries missed at operation: nemesis of the trauma surgeon

Injuries missed at initial operation have the potential to cause the most disastrous complications in trauma patients. Over the past 5 years, 12 patients have required re-operation for 14 injuries missed at initial laparotomy and/or thoracotomy. Six missed injuries were vascular, two each in the tho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of trauma Vol. 28; no. 7; p. 962
Main Authors Scalea, T M, Phillips, T F, Goldstein, A S, Sclafani, S J, Duncan, A O, Atweh, N A, Shaftan, G W
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.07.1988
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Injuries missed at initial operation have the potential to cause the most disastrous complications in trauma patients. Over the past 5 years, 12 patients have required re-operation for 14 injuries missed at initial laparotomy and/or thoracotomy. Six missed injuries were vascular, two each in the thorax, pelvis, and retroperitoneum. The other eight were visceral: three small bowel (one patient), two pancreatic, and one each of the heart, ureter, and diaphragm. Five patients (42%) died, three with missed vascular and two with missed visceral injuries. Three died due to complications directly related to their missed injuries, while the unrecognized injury did not play a significant role in the other two. Indications for re-operation in patients with vascular injuries were hypotension in two patients, persistent output from drains in three, and refractory acidosis in one. Re-exploration in visceral injuries was for clinical sepsis in three patients, DIC in one, cardiac tamponade in one, and persistent chest tube drainage in one. Eleven of the 12 patients presented to the E.D. in shock. All patients had multiple injuries with a mean of 3.25 organ systems injured. Hypotension, coagulopathy, and/or hypothermia (T less than 92 degrees) were felt to have contributed to missing the injury in five of the patients with vascular, and three of the patients with visceral injuries. In the four other patients, injuries were missed due to inadequate exploration or a low index of suspicion in the presence of multiple injuries.
ISSN:0022-5282
DOI:10.1097/00005373-198807000-00009