Specificity of cognitive distortions to antisocial behaviours

Introduction/Background Cognitive distortions have long been posited to facilitate antisocial behaviours, but the specificity of such distortions has rarely been studied. Aims To replicate findings of specificity between particular cognitions and externalizing or internalizing behaviours; to test fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCriminal behaviour and mental health Vol. 18; no. 2; pp. 104 - 116
Main Authors Barriga, Alvaro Q., Hawkins, Mark A., Camelia, Carl R. T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.04.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction/Background Cognitive distortions have long been posited to facilitate antisocial behaviours, but the specificity of such distortions has rarely been studied. Aims To replicate findings of specificity between particular cognitions and externalizing or internalizing behaviours; to test for specificity of relationship between particular cognitions and different types of externalizing behaviours. Methods The participants were 239 male youths aged 10 to 19 years (mean (M) = 14.22, standard deviation (SD) = 1.64) from schools on the island of Curaçao. Their cognitive distortions and problem behaviours were investigated through self‐report. Results In controlled analyses, self‐serving cognitive distortions were associated with externalizing behaviours whereas self‐debasing cognitive distortions were associated with internalizing behaviours. Within the externalizing domain, self‐serving distortions with overt behavioural referents were linked to aggressive behaviour while self‐serving distortions with covert behavioural referents were linked to delinquent behaviour. Within the aggression domain, distortions with opposition‐defiance referents related to verbal aggression whereas distortions with physical aggression referents related to physically aggressive behaviour. Conclusions and implications for practice The degree of cognitive‐behavioural specificity documented by this study was remarkable. The observed pattern suggests that cognitive interventions designed for externalizing versus internalizing behaviours should differ in therapeutic approach. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:istex:86FF1658971B8D0F5173FFFD9376C0E6A19EEF1B
ArticleID:CBM683
ark:/67375/WNG-42LMPSBV-R
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0957-9664
1471-2857
DOI:10.1002/cbm.683