The humanitarian turn in nuclear disarmament and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons

On July 7, 2017, at the UN General Assembly, 122 states voted to adopt the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. This was the culmination of the work of a global network of states and grassroots activists that emphasized the devastating humanitarian consequences of nuclear-weapons use in ord...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Nonproliferation review Vol. 25; no. 1-2; pp. 11 - 36
Main Author Gibbons, Rebecca Davis
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 02.01.2018
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Arms control & disarmament
Bans
Civil society
Diplomacy
Diplomats
Grass roots movement
humanitarian consequences
Humanitarianism
nuclear disarmament
Nuclear tests
Nuclear weapons
Treaties
Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:On July 7, 2017, at the UN General Assembly, 122 states voted to adopt the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. This was the culmination of the work of a global network of states and grassroots activists that emphasized the devastating humanitarian consequences of nuclear-weapons use in order to delegitimize their possession. Advocates of the ban treaty are frustrated with the slow pace of nuclear disarmament through traditional channels. This article traces the history of the ban movement from 2005 to the present. It concludes by highlighting six factors that led to the successful adoption of the treaty: a small group of committed diplomats; an influx of new coalition members; the contribution of civil society; the reframing of the narrative surrounding nuclear weapons; the pursuit of a simple ban treaty; and the context provided by the Barack Obama administration.
ISSN:1073-6700
1746-1766
DOI:10.1080/10736700.2018.1486960